I used to part of an on-line writing community. In some ways it was great. There were published authors available to give writing advice and a place to post snippets of your manuscript. All kinds of people lingered on this message board: spiritualists, atheists, lawyers, scientists, musicians, and even one sailor if I remember correctly. There was a place to post your query letter for critique and places for publishing advice. Most of us were trying to turn out one brilliant piece of writing. Since I hadn’t found my writing group yet, this was a perfect alternative.
One of the best things about this community was that it gave me a huge amount of exposure to amateur writing. Plenty of people would find this site, post the first page (or sometimes chapter) of their work in progress and ask for a critique. For a while, my goal was to write three critiques a day. Reading other people’s critiques and doing analysis of my own really helped me to sharpen my writing skills.
The first amateur mistake that really started to stick out was wordiness.
Amateur writers often want to strong-arm their readers into seeing their exact vision. They use too many words to describe a scene and then repeat themselves just to make sure the message was driven home. Really masterful writers give details that launch the writer’s imagination. Consider this paragraph from one of my early manuscripts:
Megan threw a hurried look over her shoulder and continued swiftly on. Not running. Everyone knew that the worst thing to do when you were being chased was to run. Speed walking. She glanced over her shoulder again. Those eyes, she thought. Red eyes. Adrenaline surged through her body like electricity, leaving her fingers stinging, and she looked for refuge. She hadn’t exactly seen her pursuers, save the eyes, but she heard their menacing calls. A high-pitched, terrifying, inhuman scream that seemed to summon more of them. There had been at least six sets of the glowing red eyes when last she had spied them over her shoulder and, judging from the sound of it, at least double that was behind her now.
Can you feel how forced it is? Megan is in a hurry. If you didn’t get that from the two clues in the first sentence, you might have figured it out in the clues in sentence three, four, and five. That’s me, trying too hard to set a scene. In doing so, I take a paragraph that should be fast-paced and manage to slow the progress to a crawl.
The things chasing Megan are forced, too. As a writer, I’m being mysterious and if done delicately, this can work. Just eyes and howling. But, what I do here isn’t delicate. I mention the eyes three times and their color twice. I belabor the howl in the same way. I want for the reader to hear the horrible sound I’ve conjured in my own mind so I pile the adjectives: high-pitched, terrifying, inhuman followed by the noun scream. Screams are high-pitched; I don’t need both words. “Terrifying” should be the impression the reader gets without being prompted. What I have left is “inhuman scream” which, if you think about it, does the job just fine,
These days, I’m better at reading my own writing with an eye for extra words. Even when I’m reading published books, I find myself wanting to yank a work here and there because I feel like a sentence would be stronger without it.
So what about you? Is there some early lesson that really struck a chord with you? Do you like to write wordy or are you a sparse writer? Do you think writing should launch the imagination or fill in all of the details?
I hope everyone has a quick Friday and a great weekend!


Wordiness is one problem I don’t usually have in my writing. I always think that the reader needs space to fill in, imagine and interpret. Even so, when I go back and look at earlier drafts, I see that my writing is much tighter now.
It’s very cool that you don’t have a problem with wordiness. It took a while for me to figure out how much “white space” to leave for the sake of the reader’s imagination. I think everyone has individual strengths and the most important thing is noting your own progress.
I like your blog site, Kate. You have given me some ideas as to where I might go now. I do have a web site, but I have not decided where I want to take it. I have not yet set up any links or decided to do a blog posting. I would not mind you taking a peek at it, and maybe giving a few suggestions. I liked your posting regarding wordiness, as I am great at that. I rewrite and rewrite continuously, and each time I delete and delete some more. Then again I also have a tendency to add nearly as frequently, but those additions are normally new ideas that come up or extentions of the original idea. So far, I have not attempted a novel, as I have only done nonfiction. My wife has been pestering me for a very long time to tackle a novel, and that will probably be my next project. As of now I have completed a nonfiction military ms and a memoir, and have a WIP, which is humor. The first two have not yet found a home with an agent or publisher, but I have come close a few times. Time will tell, and I wish you the best with your own writing. John
Hi John! Welcome!
I had some really go intentions when I started this blog. The idea was that I was going to analyze a young adult book in four posts and do a writing-centric post after each one. Which worked until I started writing in earnest again. Then the reading took a hit.
I read a bunch of articles before I started this site and found that although many people in the publishing industry recommend a web presence, they don’t recommend a blog unless you’re committed to keeping it up to date. A static website seemed to be a fine alternative.
I don’t write short fiction as well as I do long. I’m finding I like to spin a tale and really delve into character development. I’ve never even tried non-fiction. For me writing is an escape and non-fiction would drag me back to the real world. I’m impressed with your humor book…humor is so hard to write!
Thank you for your well-wishing and I send you the best of luck. I hope you visit again!
I noticed this a lot in my writing. I try to describe the EXACT way something is, as if I’m seeing a picture and I want to describe every single part. But great writers I have found, only choose a couple of important points, ones that help us quickly visualize the character and what kind of person they are. Then they get straight to the action. That’s really great that you can see that, it takes a lot of practice and a lot of time to learn that skill. Being objective about your own writing is very hard to do. Good luck in your career! {I’m working on my first novel write now.} Great post!
Welcome, Ollin! My mantra when I’m writing and beta reading is “Trust your readers”. Trust them that they’ll get the tone without being spoon-fed. And trust them to not need something described over and over and over. I still catch myself doing it.
Good luck with your novel! There’s never a negative to a big project like that. If it works out and it gets published…wonderful! If not, you’ve still learned a million things that you never learn any other way.
I hope you stop by again!
Thanks for the well wishes!
I think the greatest revelation for me was in reading Scene and Structure from the Writers Digest series, learning how to construct a scene with a scene question and a scene answer – basically anything but a pure “yes”. The other books in that series were enlightening: Plot as well as Beginnings, Middles and Ends, in particular. After S & S, I felt like my writing took a real step forward, and I got a lot of compliments from my beta readers – they’re soooooooooo helpful.
Giving and receiving critiques is incredibly useful. There are things that are clearer when you see them in other people’s writing, and then you start to see them in your own more clearly.
Onward!
That is a great series of writing books. I think I might do a little writing theory reading. It’s been a while since I thumbed through my “tool shelf”. I have “Conflict, Action, and Suspense” from that series as well and it was incredibly useful.
Giving and getting critiques is the most useful tool of all. It’s especially helpful when your beta reader has some quality skills.